In this study pain at rest in patients with chronic mechanical neck pain were significantly decreased at both 24 hours and 1 week after a single manipulation and multiple manipulations in comparison to the controls. The results of this study were comparable to the previous one. Similarly each of the 49 subjects had their neck pain measured on a scale of 1-10 and their range of movement was measured. One group received a single mid thoracic manipulation T6/7, another group received a manipulation at multiple levels of the mid back as decided by the treating practitioner and the third group received no treatment, as in the previous study. In this article 49 subjects with chronic neck pain where also split into 3 groups. The second study I will briefly review was published in Neuropsychiatric Disease and Treatment in 2015 2. The findings of this study are in line with other studies as well. Importantly these effects were observed both immediately and 24 hours after intervention. Additionally, a single thoracic mobilization also significantly reduced pain levels at rest and increased neck range of motion in all directions except extension in comparison with a control group. The results of the study found that the subject’s pain at rest improved and their neck range of motion in all directions after single thoracic manipulation improved significantly. Comparisons were then made between theses three groups. The subjects were then randomly assigned to receive a single manipulation (audible crack) at T6/7 or single mid thoracic mobilisation (no audible crack) at T6/7 or to rest in a face down position (the control group). These are the same types of symptoms that we see in practice every day.Įach of the 39 subjects had their neck pain measured on a scale of 1-10 and their range of movement was measured. Subjects included in this study had a variety of neck pain, including pain on the left and right or both, pain in the back of the neck and shoulder region, and pain which was brought on by neck movement or fingertip pressure. 39 patients with chronic mechanical neck pain where evaluated to see whether a manipulation in their mid-back (T6/7) decreased their neck pain and increased the range of movement of their neck. There are 2 very similar studies I will be reviewing today, the first is a study conducted in Thailand and published in the journal of Physical Therapy Science in 2013 1. The prevalence of neck pain has generally been reported to be approximately 50% for workers. Neck pain is one of the most common health problems in the general population, particularly among people of working age. I won’t individually reference all of these articles as the referencing will bog down the purpose of this article which is to provide the public with valid and interesting facts about their spine. I was surprised to see there has been a great deal of research performed over the last 20 years which has focused on the relationship between the mid back and the neck. After finding this article I delved a bit deeper, looking into other similar articles about this topic, mostly to give myself some background by which to write this article in a more informed context. I recently discovered a research paper from Thailand published in the Journal of Physical Therapy Science that researched the effect that spinal manipulation of the thoracic spine (mid back) has on chronic neck symptoms.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |